


Published in Dental and Medical Problems
A finite element analysis comparing stress distribution around carbon fibre-reinforced PEEK implants versus traditional titanium implants with different prosthetic crown materials — exploring the future of metal-free implant dentistry.
Published in Dental and Medical Problems — September 2021. Co-authored by Swapnil Tamrakar, Sunil Kumar Mishra, Ramesh Chowdhary, and Dr. B. Srinivas Rao.
Titanium has been the gold standard material for dental implants for over five decades. Its excellent biocompatibility, strength, and ability to fuse with bone through osseointegration have made it the most trusted choice in implant dentistry worldwide. But a question has been gaining attention in recent years — could there be a better material?
Carbon fibre-reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK) has emerged as a potential challenger. Unlike titanium, which is a metal, CFR-PEEK is a polymer-based composite. Its most compelling property is that its stiffness is remarkably close to that of natural bone — far closer than titanium, which is significantly stiffer. This matters because when an implant is much stiffer than the bone around it, a phenomenon called stress shielding can occur, where the bone is deprived of normal mechanical stimulation and gradually resorbs over time.
This study investigated whether CFR-PEEK implants could distribute chewing forces more favourably than titanium implants, and whether the type of crown placed on top makes a difference.
1. Titanium implant with a porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crown 2. Titanium implant with a full zirconia crown 3. CFR-PEEK implant with a PFM crown 4. CFR-PEEK implant with a full zirconia crown
Each combination was subjected to both vertical biting forces (150 Newtons) and oblique chewing forces (50 Newtons at 45 degrees) — simulating real-world eating conditions. The resulting stress patterns in the implant, the surrounding cortical bone, and the cancellous (spongy) bone were measured and compared.
Titanium implants, being much stiffer, transmitted higher stress peaks directly to the crestal bone — the critical region at the top of the implant where bone loss most commonly begins. This difference was more pronounced under oblique forces, which are the more damaging type of load in everyday chewing.
Interestingly, the crown material also played a role. Zirconia crowns, being stiffer than PFM crowns, tended to concentrate more stress at the implant-bone interface regardless of which implant material was used. The most bone-friendly combination in the simulation was a CFR-PEEK implant with a PFM crown.
However, CFR-PEEK implants are still in relatively early stages of clinical adoption. Long-term human studies are needed to confirm whether these laboratory and computational advantages translate into better real-world outcomes over 10, 15, or 20 years.
The choice of crown material on top of your implant also matters more than most patients realise. This research demonstrates that the entire system — implant, abutment, and crown — works together as a unit, and each component's material properties influence how forces reach your bone.
Published: September 2021
Type: Finite Element Analysis Study
Read the original publication on ResearchGate.
CFR-PEEK (Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone) implants are metal-free, high-strength composite implants designed to mimic the natural flexibility of bone.
Stress shielding occurs when a metal implant is much stiffer than the surrounding bone, causing it to absorb all the chewing forces. This deprives the bone of stimulation, which can lead to bone loss.
Medically Reviewed By
MDS Prosthodontics, Fellow & Diplomate ICOI (USA) · Chief Implantologist · Last updated: May 2026
A finite element analysis comparing stress distribution patterns in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses made with zirconia and PEEK frameworks — revealing how material choice impacts long-term implant health.
Dr. B. Srinivas Rao co-authored the landmark 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines on rehabilitating the completely toothless upper jaw — published in Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2026.
A systematic review co-authored by Dr. B. Srinivas Rao evaluating whether high-performance polymers PEEK and PEKK can serve as viable alternatives to metal frameworks in complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.